当前位置：
  1. 首页
  2. 资源
  3. 正文

沟通之前：希望您能花，三到五分钟的时间，观看我们的视频，对我们的能力，有一个初步判断。

佩斯大学毕业照展示

佩斯大学毕业照

在肯尼亚3月4日选举中寻求总统职位的政治家们提出了对高等教育的深远影响。 在最近几周发布的宣言中，顶尖的候选人除其他事项外，还提议重组高等教育，使其免费，建设更多的技术学院、新的佩斯大学的大学生佩斯大学奖学金和为佩斯大学讲师提供更高的薪水。 尼斯特·Raila Odinga和他的副手乌胡鲁·肯雅塔。 后者是肯尼亚独立后第一位领导人乔莫·肯亚塔的儿子，前财政部长，被国际刑事法院指控策划了2007年大选后造成1200人死亡的暴力事件。 两位候选人都建议接受高等教育。 相关的变化，从扩大目前的能力，增加资金和助学金。 他们还在考虑在一个技术人才库无法满足不断增长的需求的国家扩大进一步的技术教育。 财政部的文件显示，肯尼亚在本财政年度为佩斯大学拨款600亿克什米尔（7.32亿美元），高于2011年的440亿克什米尔。 但是，即使资金大幅增加，佩斯大学也难以应付不断增加的申请入学的佩斯大学的大学生。 国家。 肯亚塔的宣言中写道：“我们想扩大中学后佩斯大学学位的数量，目的是给刚毕业的中学毕业生提供高等学历。 ”根据肯尼亚经济部的数据，在过去的五年中，佩斯大佩斯大学的大学生人数翻了一番，从91541人增加到180000人。 调查2012。 这需要对教育体系进行重大变革，人们对在佩斯大学学习质量的担忧也越来越大。 由于空间的限制，去年118256名合格佩斯大学的大学生中只有41000人获得了公立佩斯大学的资格。 剩下的76000人被迫在昂贵的私立佩斯大学寻找位置，在公立佩斯大学参加同样昂贵的“平行”（全费）佩斯大学课程，或者进入学院或青年理工学院。 预计今年这个数字还会进一步激增。 肯尼亚公立佩斯大学的数量将从目前的七所增加到22所。 在过去的六个星期里，姆瓦伊·齐贝吉总统已经颁发了八所佩斯大学章程。 以前，学院与现有公立佩斯大学结盟。 预计齐贝吉将在3月大选后离职之前再颁布七项宪章。 肯雅塔还计划建立“商业助学金计划”，并通过税收激励措施鼓励私营公司为资助高等院校贫困佩斯大学的大学生的计划捐款。 这样的计划可以补充高等教育贷款委员会，HELB，它一直努力跟上不断增长的资金需求。 HELB每年从政府获得至少15亿克朗（合1,800万美元）的贷款给佩斯大学的大学生，这笔拨款近年来并没有真正增长，而且已经落后于佩斯大学的大学生人数。 贷款委员会每年给贫困佩斯大学的大学生650美元左右，以帮助支付学费和住宿费，以及尽管生活费用激增，但四年来仍无法增加学费。 HELB表示，将需要追加1,300万美元以充分支持额外的佩斯大学的大学生。 但是，有迹象表明政府负担不起，贷款机构被迫重新考虑其筹资战略。 公立佩斯大学承受着超过40000名佩斯大学的大学生入学的压力。 肯雅塔的欢庆联盟还提议通过佩斯大学资助佩斯大学的大学生，以换取毕业后一年的工作承诺。 奥廷加的远见现任首相拉伊拉·奥廷加说，如果当选总统，他的政府将提供包括佩斯大学在内的所有级别的免费教育。 他在《改革与民主联盟》的宣言中承诺：“通过公私合作，我们将改革各级公共教育设施，提供优质免费教育。 我们还将审查教师和佩斯大学讲师的聘用条件，以确保教师和佩斯大学讲师的长期就业。 ”服务和和谐。 “佩斯大学讲师的薪水一直是个有争议的问题。 9月，公立佩斯大学超过120000名学术和非佩斯大学教学人员举行罢工，要求提高工资和服务条件，使机构瘫痪。 佩斯大学学术职员工会和佩斯大学非佩斯大学教学职员工会一直要求全面执行由工会和佩斯大学管理层签署的2010-12-14年度集体谈判协议，该协议保证在残酷的灾难后改善工资和服务条件。 瑞克。 KenyattaKenyatta还承诺加强佩斯大学教育委员会（CUE），使公立佩斯大学免于法定地位，并为它们提供独立的章程。 他认为，这将使CUE能更有效地管理佩斯大学教学、研究和毕业生的质量。 根据上个月生效的2010年佩斯大学法，CUE是高等教育委员会的继任者。 它寻求改革肯尼亚的高等教育。 肯雅塔说：“我们将鼓励佩斯大学在研究、技术和创新方面进行投资，并扭转当前将中级学院转变为佩斯大学并恢复佩斯大学的趋势。 ”在过去五年中，许多技术学院被寻求新设施的佩斯大学接管，以使它们能够满足不断增长的佩斯大学的大学生需求。 这激怒了批评者，他们认为这些收购正在扼杀教育体系的一个重要部分，否认了经济技术佩斯大学传给技能。 佩斯大学毕业照

A countrywide academic boycott staged across all public sector universities in Pakistan last week due to anger at the government’s refusal to provide already-allocated funds to the country’s 72 universities, led to a government climb-down for fear the protests might lead to violent clashes. The government agreed to release funds for the current financial year and award a 50% pay rise to university teachers, which it had announced on 25 June but had denied to academics because funds were not available. Vice-chancellors had threatened a complete shutdown of higher education institutions if they are denied adequate resources to run them. During the boycott, teachers and students wore black bands in protest against the cut in university funding in the first ever countrywide protests on higher education staged across all four of the country’s provinces in almost all universities. Many universities were deserted, with students finding classrooms locked during Wednesday’s boycott called by the All Pakistan Universities Academic Staff Association (Fapuasa). Students backed the call, protesting in universities’ grounds. Analysts said although no violence related to the Wednesday boycott was reported, if the government had not yielded to some of the demands, it could have sparked clashes between protesters and law enforcement agencies. Fapuasa had threatened an indefinite strike unless the government gave in. The government said in a statement on Thursday after talks with vice-chancellors that it would release the money for salaries “immediately”, although some academics said it was simply “re-promising promised money”. The statement also said all university projects in an advanced stage of completion would be funded. Chairman of the Higher Education Commission Javed Leghari said the money for salaries would be released this month. “I think they [the universities] should call off the strike,” he said on Thursday. Fapuasa president Mahr Saeed Aktar told local media the government’s offer was “too little too late” and the federation would meet to decide on a course of action. Some Fapausa members believe it is merely a political tactic because the government fears losing public support. The government was severely criticised when it reduced university funding in its annual budget approved by the parliament on 25 June. But no one expected money already approved by parliament would be denied later. Floods ravaged Pakistan just a month after the education budget was approved and the government decided to halve its development budget from 663 billion rupees (US$7. 7 billion) to 300 billion rupees to divert resources towards flood-related relief and rehabilitation. An allocation of 15. 76 billion rupees (US$184 million) was made to the Pakistan’s Higher Education Commission (HEC) which funds universities in the 2010-11 development budget – nearly a third less than last year’s 22. 5 billion rupees. The government has released only 2. 1 billion rupees against a requirement of five billion rupees for first quarter of the new financial year that started on 1 July, with many university teachers unpaid for months. Coupled with the 33% decrease, an across the board 50% cut in the development budget would bring universities’ funding down by 83%. Talking to University World News Dr Ashfaque Hassan Khan, Director General at the National University of Science and Technology in Islamabad, termed the colossal decrease in the universities’ budget an “assassination of higher education in Pakistan”. He said government must spare universities and save money from other sectors for flood-related reconstruction. Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission of Pakistan, Nadeem Ul Haq, told University World News: “We have not cut the funds, in fact we do not have any more money to give to the universities. ” This is contradicted by the prime minister’s television statement in which he said: “Despite resource constraints on account of flood devastation, education remains high priority for the democratic government. ” In meetings between Finance Minister Abdul Hafeez Sheikh and vice-chancellors of public sector universities on 17 and 21 September, the minister refused to release the funds through the HEC. Instead he advised vice-chancellors to generate money themselves by selling surplus lands, going for public-private partnerships or even increasing student fees. Vice-chancellors had said they would send students home and lock up their university buildings if funds were not released. In a tense meeting with the finance minister on 17 September, vice-chancellors also threatened to resign en masse. Nawaz Sharif, chief of the main opposition party the Muslim League, condemned the cuts. Sharif, a former prime minister, said that “financial constraints should not be an excuse to deny money to the universities. Government can save on other funds by practicing austerity. ”